<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for slipgate.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slipgate.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slipgate.net</link>
	<description>Development, Scrum and Agile.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why your project key figure will probably not be a great Scrum Master by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://slipgate.net/2011/06/20/why-your-project-key-figure-will-probably-not-be-a-great-scrum-master/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slipgate.net/?p=11#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I just re-read this entry since I could not get the whole picture the first time I read it (when it was published). I understand the message better now. I dare not say that completely agree since I do not have deeper understanding of Scrum, but I definitely can see that it makes sense to not asume a (great) key figure is guaranteed to be a equally great SM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just re-read this entry since I could not get the whole picture the first time I read it (when it was published). I understand the message better now. I dare not say that completely agree since I do not have deeper understanding of Scrum, but I definitely can see that it makes sense to not asume a (great) key figure is guaranteed to be a equally great SM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python snippet: for&#8230;else by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://slipgate.net/2011/07/18/python-snippet-for-else/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slipgate.net/?p=38#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Useful, thanks. :) According to my limited Google skills ruby lacks this loop feature. Quite interesting since many other handy features from Python are implemented in Ruby as well.

Python &lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful, thanks. <img src='http://slipgate.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  According to my limited Google skills ruby lacks this loop feature. Quite interesting since many other handy features from Python are implemented in Ruby as well.</p>
<p>Python &lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Python snippet: for&#8230;else by Emilio Cuberos</title>
		<link>http://slipgate.net/2011/07/18/python-snippet-for-else/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilio Cuberos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slipgate.net/?p=38#comment-5</guid>
		<description>:-O good to know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-O good to know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

